Monday, July 31, 2006

How much to enjoy the view?

What is your price? Is it twenty grand? Is it two grand? What is the amount of money it would take for you to put a gas and oil well in your back yard? Now imagine you make forty-five million dollars per year. Is twenty grand still as enticing? Is two grand? The reality of the situation is this: 2 weeks of 24-hour-a-day drilling, twenty years of pumping, worries and property value depreciation for wells that if we are lucky will produce twenty-thousand dollars per year for the district. But if we are like typical wells in the area, they will generate about two thousand dollars per year. Two thousand dollars added to a forty-five million dollar budget. Is that worth the drawbacks?

Another pretty storage tank

I hear the supporters already. They are like drones in my head. "We promised we would look for alternative revenues" Let me put this in simple terms. This is the amount of money that one $100,000.00 house in CF generates with a years worth of property taxes. This is not a viable source of alternative revenue. When we were promised a looksy at alternative revenues, I expected something like the income tax on wage earners, or the shared county sales tax, or charging a real fee for pay-to-play (current pay-to-play collections amount to about half of the athletic directors salary). Someone referred to the board as a "bunch of lay people". Sometimes it takes someone looking in from the outside to notice the waste, mismanagement, and middleman overload. There is a larger administrator to teacher ratio and administrator to pupil ratio than there was 20 years ago with twice as many students. Why do we need more management for fewer students? There is a saying I keep hearing over and over. Bad teachers become administrators, and bad administrators become consultants. There, I said it. Of course I generalize. There are some good administrators out there. We even employ quite a few. But why do administration numbers go up and up with student population declining? Remember? Student population declined to the point that we had to close two schools. And guess what? Add one more new position to the "bring 'em back" from project recovery list. I see it this way, the positive balance we ended with this year before the last minute debt was paid, could have kept Newberry and Sill open this year. I know, I know, get over it Kellie. Ironic how last week I read an article from an education organization in my packet from the district. It dealt with problems children experience when changing schools.

What I'm trying to point out is this- Whether it's putting oil and gas wells on public property, closing schools, or putting towers up in somebody's skyline, our district is making decisions that affect some peoples personal lives. Sometimes money isn't the only thing at stake. Property values, emotional well being, and being able to enjoy your own neighborhood without looking at an eye sore and worry about a safety hazard for me is worth more than the little bit of money earned or saved. And I can't tell you how angry I was writing a check to the Summit County Fiscal Officer last week knowing we had enough money left over this year to have kept my sons' school open and saved us the emotional turmoil its closing caused. And bonus for all you Kellie haters- you wouldn't be hearing my contraire views all the time. I'd have sat down and shut up.But I have learned the hard way that if you support levies and always pay your taxes on time and believe the promises made to you, you can still get screwed. I feel robbed. People living on the edge of the proposed gas and oil wells have the gun to their head right now. You could be the next victim.

Jack-style well

Bolich Marker

In full view of these houses on Silver Lake Ave.

Click here for more photos of local wells and the locations where our school district would like to put them.

3 comments:

Molly Benedum said...

Hi Barry, I know that Kellie is out of town right now so I thought I'd share some of what I have learned in looking into these wells. The revenues that a school (or any property owner) will realize from a well are based on how much that well produces, not on what type of entity the property owners are. In fact, I have heard from several people in the oil and natural gas industry that the agreements are fairly standard from one well to the next.

In this letter that I linked on my blog, they give examples that show revenues ranging from $1,817.59 down to $176.25 (this one is actually within the City of CF) per month. These figures do not include the free gas, but the best example included an estimate that the property owner had received the equivalent of $2,000 worth of gas per year.

I don't know of any problems that the schools/districts you listed may have had with their wells. My first thought about all of those examples though is that none of them are in areas that are as densely populated as the Newberry/Bolich neighborhood. I would also hazard a guess that none of those wells are on property that is also used as a city park. My belief is that those two factors increase the potential for safety issues and irate neighbors.

www.tnl3000.com said...

Please allow me to comment on the process od problem solving that is being used here.

The first question is -- do we share the same purpose (reason for existing)? I think that most of us want to IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION at a cost that our community can afford. When I say, "... quality of education' then I mean 'ABILITY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS'. When our public money trains people to solve problems then we create new opportunities for everyone.

The second question is -- what are some of the problem statements (from a process viewpoint) that might keep us from reaching our shared purpose? With respect to this blog, the problem statements are scattered through out all of the responder's comments.

Here are some of the problem statements (from a process viewpoint) that I see occuring on this blog:
1. Some ... vent their anger toward others and threaten them.
2. Some render judgments without asking for more clarification of the facts.
3. Some project conspiracies that pair others into sub-teams with other sub-agendas.

The third question is -- what are some of the solution statements (from a process viewpoint) that might help us reach our shared purpose? Again, the solution statements are scattered through out the comments.

1. Some comments add more facts and show an ability to analize the data in a thoughtful manner.

2. Strong feelings may drive the thoughts. But, the comments are written in a manner that defers judgment.

3. A list of questions was constructed by Molly for the BOE decision makers to consider.

In conclusion, and again from a process viewpoint, the question becomes what can the people (leaders) who comment on this blog do to help our BOE make informed choices? Here are some considerations:
1. List all of the reasons why we might want to drill.
2. List all of the reasons why we may not want to drill.
3. Ask people to add to the two lists.

Given these two lists people can then make informed choices by understanding all of their options and the possible results.

As a voter, I watch for leaders who use the best decision making process. Their leadership model will improve the ABILITY OF OUR SCHOOLS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS. And, I think our students WILL WANT TO LEARN from these leaders.

Lou Schott 330-923-9328

www.tnl3000.com said...

Please allow me to suggest a money making project for our school. We could take orders for T-shirts. All money could go to the school. The T-shirts could say, "I survived the blogging of 2006."

What do you think? I think we may need to order some T-shirts that make a person look invisible -- for the people who prefer to remain anonymous.

Send your orders to lschott@neo.rr.com .