Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Is Virtual a Reality?

I will assume that if you are reading this, you are familiar with the internet and its many capabilities. We are a society that expects to Google a word and have 5 million resources at our fingertips in about 3 seconds flat. Notice how the word Google has replaced “search”. And notice how spell check likes Google, but not google. It will be in Merriam Webster before this decade is done. It used to be that people gathered in the town square and waited for the Pony Express to deliver weeks old, sometimes month’s old news. Now we can watch congress with a ten second delay.

Many cities and townships broadcast their council and school board meetings through the cable systems local access channels. But that leaves out satellite users. And the five people that still use antennas.

The internet solved these problem years ago, but government bureaucrats have been slow to embrace this “new” way of community outreach. It’s simple and cheap to broadcast meetings via the web. If you want it to be.

But what about the things that are behind the broadcast? The contracts, the resolutions, the financial transactions? There is more paperwork involved in school business than you can imagine. I’m sure an entire forest in southern Ohio has been cut down and turned into documents I have received over the last two years. On top of that, the tax payers never see 99% of these public documents. Oh, they could. They could go down to the board offices, request and pay for copies. Or they could set up an appointment and inspect records all day with a district employee.

Or we could start using BoardDocs.com. Please check out their web site. To attempt to sum it up, any and all information could be available to you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 day a year, plus leap day. Meetings are recorded electronically and vote counts can be posted instantaneously. Paperwork can be, but doesn’t have to be, non existent. But the best part I think is the public access. I have always been a proponent of open government and easy access.

We want involvement but at what price? People cannot structure their lives around government meetings. But they can and do look for info on the internet at their leisure. Does not going to meetings mean you do not care about the state of affairs? Or does it mean you have a busy life? I fully support implementing this program. It embraces everything I feel open government, transparency, public access, and open records should be. When you want it. At a cost of $10,000 a year. A drop in the bucket is a phrase I commonly hear about amounts such as this.

A powerful tool for the public, as well as the board and administrators. I’ll put it in levy terms. That’s 50 cents per household per year. Or about 20 cents per person. It’s an expenditure I fully support.

8 comments:

Molly Benedum said...

I'm sorry but I don't see the need for this package at this time. The additional information available to public is the only benefit I see to this expense. The board and the administration could provide that additional access with tools that they already have at no additional expense. Unfortunately, they choose not to do that.

The City Council is a far larger body, voting on much larger issues, involving far greater dollars. They seem to be able to conduct their business without having to have a laptop in front of them to do it.

I'm a big fan of technology when it's used appropriately and in a fiscally-responsible manner. We should be saving that money to heat some buildings this winter or gas up a bus or two. To spend it for the convenience of and to boost the self-importance of just 5people is not only a waste, it's just plain irresponsible.

taxpayer said...

I would have to agree with you Molly. If times were good and we had more money than we knew what to spend it on, this would be fine, but that is not the case. Remember we had to pass levies not too long ago to keep the State from taking over our district and now we want to add more frills? As homeowners there are lots of things we would LIKE to have but we give those desires up when times are tough. It should be the same with the school district and cities/villages. And what makes you think that "busy" people would find or make the extra time to look this information up on the web either? I truly think that people do not waste their time attending BOE meetings because the board and administration don't really care what they think and don't want to hear what they think, so why bother? Adding some fancy computer system isn't going to make the people in this district care or become involved any more than they are currently. The taxpaying public is apathetic and/or just plain FED UP. Buying a system like this would be just one more show of the fiscal irresponsibility that has prevailed in our district for years and years. As I have said before, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Ari Ioannides said...

I wonder how much money the district spends producing and distributing the existing paper packet. The treasurer at Westerville schools estimated the cost of producing a paper packet was over $20,000 per year, and weekly packets of over $7,000 per month. Using numbers like this, I think you should add saving time and money to Kellie’s list.

taxpayer said...

Ari, But perhaps somebody might not have anything to do if they couldn't print and assemble packets and they would be out of a job? I'm sure there is a way to send that information to the BOE members electronically without buying some fancy system.

Molly Benedum said...

The last time I looked the most recent 5-Year Forecast (online at the Ohio Department of Education) for this district showed that we would be over a million dollars in the hole by the end of the 2009/10 school year. Instead of taking the money that they are currently spending on printing packets and spending it on a fancy, industry-specific package, they could be looking at ways to not spend that money at all. After all, printing those packets doesn’t benefit the children of this district in any way.

The district (and the Board) could, if they really wanted to, agree to scan the packet into a PDF document and email it to each of the members. I know all of the members have computers at home. City Council does this. It would save the cost of paper, printing, binding and personal delivery of the packets AND wouldn’t be spending the money on simply delivering the information in a different way.

Would it be as convenient for the Board members? No. But I thought that Board members were elected to “serve” this community and its’ children, not spend money for their own convenience. And go look at the website for this product. There is a “light” (LT) version of this product that doesn’t include any kind of public access. Just watch and see which version of the package they end up buying because this Board isn’t really about making more information available to the public. In the end, they will tell us that they’ve saved us money when all they’ve really done is bought themselves an electronic status symbol and push-button voting system.

I know that’s going to bring up the district’s math scores…

rl said...

Unfortunately, "public access" does not necessarily translate into public involvement, as in an overall increase in public attendance at school board meetings. Given the reach of the internet into most folks dailey lives, one might also argue that we no longer need elected representatives for such local offices. Any concerned citzens could study the data available for a given situation and, at a specified time, vote online...a true democracy.

Now, why is it ok to spend thousands of dollars on yet another means of spreading electrons throughout the universe but not on any physical measures to ensure the safety of our children at school?

www.tnl3000.com said...

To: All of the kind people who want to solve more problems,

Without the benefit of a thorough analysis, I would tend to examine what we can do at no cost using the tools available from Microsoft and Google. When we use both of their tools (in a synchronized and systematic manner) then we serve the needs of more than just the leaders of our community. We also involve and inform the members of our community.

Plus, we are then positioned to compete in the global information based economy.

Please consider sending me a set of representative documents and a process flow chart. I will set up some tools so that you can further examine the potential. Thus, you are positioned to make a more informed choice regarding the expenditure of $10,000.

Let me know how I can help.

Lou Schott

www.tnl3000.com said...

Molly,

Actually, I see Mary Ellen Pyke and Carol Klinger user their laptops all of the time during city council meetings. And, they email each other during the meeting. And, they 'google' the Internet during the council meetings to get ideas related to their current discussion topics.

Hope this helps.
Lou